With due merit to be given to all the hypothesis derived directly or indirectly from equation as described by slutsky, there have been a disappointingly small amount of theories relating the performance of several theories related to oligopolistic markets and there relation to the zero-sum game environment. Whereas considerable research has been done in ideal scenarios such as that of the perfect market and perfect monopoly, the lack of data relating to imperfect oligopolies without a predictable consumer base has been a hindrance for many a scientist and research, in addition to the fact that even the academic institutions related to the field have been unable to move forward due to the lack of the most basic pilot researches that should establish expectations from the following projects.
The constraints in the field arise not due to the physical difficulty of conducting experiments but the conditions of variables that makes it almost impossible to hold any given variable under under control, thus not fulfilling the most basic condition required: ceteris paribus. The scientific teams which have attempted various specially-designed experiments for the issue report that the very epi-zellta condition as established by Boltzmann in the early thirties has not been satisfied, even without the 28 percent error margin as later allowed by the Panasche's Indefinitablity Situation. In addition, the OEMs used in the experiments have not been able to control for the variable regression that is introduced as a result of the Copenhagen Indivisibility by experimenters attempting to measure market variables by using and/or asking economic tools for the analysis of the equilibrium condition.
In such a situation, one has to wonder whether the Keynesian critique of Zeta-Bose indefinite clause can be defended, and if it can, what imperatives it may imply as the result. Moreover, the experimental practices used by econometrics as well as scientists in other field should come under great scrutiny if the claimed constraints were proven to be true. While it will not make significant difference to the theories already established on the basis of empirical data, newer hypothesis and theories proposed later than 1982 (when the Brussels Interpretation of the given market scenario was defined) will have to be supported by a strong backbone of empirical data or else fear being dismissed.
While it is understandable that the existing pareto-maximisation strategies re questioned with the change in market situation and consumer tastes, the proposed change in theory would cause a major reanalysis of all the existing techniques for determining formulae or functions to predict the unknowns in Economics.
/Bullshit practice